Montclair Roofing Awards: 10 Reasons Why They Don’t Work & What You Can Do About It

Owners who view the roofing system as a one-time expense, and make specification decisions based solely on first costs, run the risk of incurring higher roof maintenance and repair expenditures. The bottom line: Selecting the incorrect system will probably cost a facility executive more than if the right system had initially been selected.

High repair costs can be prevented by installing a high-performance roofing system and conducting routine preventive maintenance throughout the life of the roof. The first cost of a quality roofing system could be higher, however the lower life-cycle costs of the machine will more than offset the original investment.

The initial cost of a roofing system includes materials, labor, overhead, profit and indirect costs associated with the structure. The life-cycle analysis takes the first cost of the roof, then adds to it the future costs of operation and maintenance on the economic life of the roof.

The facility executive that does not think about the value of a life-cycle costing approach to the purchase of a fresh roof does the facility and everyone involved with it a financial disservice. First-cost buyers may overlook such important future expense reduction opportunities as:

? Energy cost benefits in the heating and air conditioning of the building through the use of white, reflective membranes or coatings and further insulation.
? Extended roof service life for an optimally drained roof.
? Enhanced roof fire retardence and wind uplift resistance, leading to reduced insurance costs.
? Extended roof service life caused by the application of heavier structural framing materials, allowing a heavier roofing system.
? Future savings when the roof is usually to be Montclair Roofers replaced through the use of reusable roof component accessories.
? Reduced roofing surface repairs through installing a heavier membrane of walkway pads for high-traffic roofs.
? Prevention of roof surface degradation in those roof areas where harmful emissions might occur by installing appropriate protective devices.

Probably the most cost-effective roof is one which will stand up to sun and rain and demands of time. Therefore, facility executives should be actively involved in the initial planning stages to determine the best roofing system using the established criteria for the building.

Planning and Specification

Make sure the roofing system will meet the needs of the facility by answering the following questions:

? What type of system will provide the best long-term performance and energy efficiency?
? How will weather conditions and climate affect the building and roof?
? What is the required service life of the roof?
? Is resale value of the building important?
? Which kind of system will incorporate the very best drainage characteristics?
? Which kind of maintenance program will undoubtedly be followed?
? What are the expectations for the roof?
? Are there environmental concerns?
? Does the roof have to be wind- and fire-rated?

Once these questions have been answered, start the choice process based on location, physical characteristics, and building structure and type. Then choose quality products specifically engineered to be integrated and installed as a whole roofing system. To get this done, form long-term relationships with manufacturers which are financially sound and have a reputation for commitment and experience in the marketplace. Check the history of suppliers, as well as the quality controls they offer during installation.

Life-cycle costing analysis doesn’t do worthwhile if the facility executive chooses a manufacturer that is unable to demonstrate financial stability, experience and roofing system longevity.
Successful roofing installations also be determined by the expertise of a quality-focused, professional roofing contractor.

Many times, roofing is specified merely to obtain the building covered and protected. Facility executives should recognize that the majority of the cost is in labor. Slightly more material dollars in advance may save many dollars on premature replacement costs.